<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: public class SubSonic3: IEnjoyable</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.componentoriented.com/2008/11/public-class-subsonic3-ienjoyable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.componentoriented.com/2008/11/public-class-subsonic3-ienjoyable/</link>
	<description>My thoughts on software development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 18:19:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: D. Lambert</title>
		<link>http://blog.componentoriented.com/2008/11/public-class-subsonic3-ienjoyable/comment-page-1/#comment-438</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Lambert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.componentoriented.com/?p=394#comment-438</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s another look at 3.0:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://jamesewelch.wordpress.com/2009/08/19/subsonic-3-0/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://jamesewelch.wordpress.com/2009/08/19/sub...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Apparently, this has lit a bit of a fire under Rob: &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.wekeroad.com/blog/i-love-reviews/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://blog.wekeroad.com/blog/i-love-reviews/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;;-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In any event, whichever side of the fence you end up on, I really think you should take this for a drive around the block if you&#039;re looking at data access technologies, because it&#039;s not  the same thing your&#039;re going to see everywhere else.  Give it a chance, and decide for yourself if different is better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#39;s another look at 3.0:  <a href="http://jamesewelch.wordpress.com/2009/08/19/subsonic-3-0/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://jamesewelch.wordpress.com/2009/08/19/sub.." rel="nofollow">http://jamesewelch.wordpress.com/2009/08/19/sub..</a>.</p>
<p>Apparently, this has lit a bit of a fire under Rob: <a href="http://blog.wekeroad.com/blog/i-love-reviews/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.wekeroad.com/blog/i-love-reviews/</a></p>
<p> <img src='http://blog.componentoriented.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>In any event, whichever side of the fence you end up on, I really think you should take this for a drive around the block if you&#39;re looking at data access technologies, because it&#39;s not  the same thing your&#39;re going to see everywhere else.  Give it a chance, and decide for yourself if different is better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. Lambert</title>
		<link>http://blog.componentoriented.com/2008/11/public-class-subsonic3-ienjoyable/comment-page-1/#comment-314</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Lambert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.componentoriented.com/?p=394#comment-314</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s another look at 3.0:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://jamesewelch.wordpress.com/2009/08/19/subsonic-3-0/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://jamesewelch.wordpress.com/2009/08/19/sub...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Apparently, this has lit a bit of a fire under Rob: &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.wekeroad.com/blog/i-love-reviews/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://blog.wekeroad.com/blog/i-love-reviews/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;;-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In any event, whichever side of the fence you end up on, I really think you should take this for a drive around the block if you&#039;re looking at data access technologies, because it&#039;s not  the same thing your&#039;re going to see everywhere else.  Give it a chance, and decide for yourself if different is better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#39;s another look at 3.0:  <a href="http://jamesewelch.wordpress.com/2009/08/19/subsonic-3-0/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://jamesewelch.wordpress.com/2009/08/19/sub.." rel="nofollow">http://jamesewelch.wordpress.com/2009/08/19/sub..</a>.</p>
<p>Apparently, this has lit a bit of a fire under Rob: <a href="http://blog.wekeroad.com/blog/i-love-reviews/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.wekeroad.com/blog/i-love-reviews/</a></p>
<p> <img src='http://blog.componentoriented.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>In any event, whichever side of the fence you end up on, I really think you should take this for a drive around the block if you&#39;re looking at data access technologies, because it&#39;s not  the same thing your&#39;re going to see everywhere else.  Give it a chance, and decide for yourself if different is better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
